Beijing Law Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd.
北京律诚同业知识产权代理有限公司
北京律诚同业知识产权代理有限公司
search
Search
Position:
home
>
>
Chinese Drone Maker Turns to US International Trade Commission to Settle Patent Dispute
Check category

Chinese Drone Maker Turns to US International Trade Commission to Settle Patent Dispute

  • Number of Views:
  • Date:2018-09-13

(Summary description)  A Chinese drone maker has turned to a U.S. federal agency in hopes of settling a patent-infringement complaint against a Chinese competitor, in a case that highlights how a drone maker, through Chin

Chinese Drone Maker Turns to US International Trade Commission to Settle Patent Dispute

(Summary description)  A Chinese drone maker has turned to a U.S. federal agency in hopes of settling a patent-infringement complaint against a Chinese competitor, in a case that highlights how a drone maker, through Chin

  • Number of Views:
  • Date:2018-09-13
Information

  A Chinese drone maker has turned to a U.S. federal agency in hopes of settling a patent-infringement complaint against a Chinese competitor, in a case that highlights how a drone maker, through Chinese government subsidies, has risen to be a global leader.

  DJI, the world’s largest maker of civilian drones, is the target of a complaint filed at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) by Autel Robotics USA, a U.S. subsidiary of China-based Autel, according to an ITC notice issued on Aug. 30. Both DJI and Autel are based in Shenzhen, a metropolis in southern China that borders Hong Kong.

  The complaint alleges that DJI violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, a trade law that enforces U.S. intellectual-property rights at the border. If ITC determines that DJI violated Section 337, the import and sale of its drones would be halted and the company would be shut out of the U.S. market.

  The dispute centers around drones used for aerial photography, videotaping, and agricultural purposes.

  The unmanned devices have many applications, including mapping and surveying, meaning that they can take aerial photos and analyze farms. When equipped with a small canister, they can be used to spray farms with fertilizers and pesticides. DJI is accused of infringing on some of Autel’s patented drone features, including rotor assembly; a way to switch out battery packs; and how a drone follows a flight path while avoiding obstacles, according to a Bloomberg report.

  DJI and Autel have been embroiled in a legal battle in U.S. court for several years. In August 2016, DJI filed a lawsuit against Autel at a federal court in Delaware, saying Autel’s X-star series of drones infringed on one of its patents, claiming similarities in the drones’ design compared to the drawing outlines in a DJIs patent. A year later in May, DJI filed another suit against Autel at a federal court for the Western District of Washington.

  In April, Autel filed its own lawsuit against DJI at a federal court in New York City. Autel accused DJI of infringing on one of its patents across several lines of drones, including the Mavic, Spark, Phantom, and Inspire series, given the similarities in features such as the intelligent braking system and sensors.DJI

  According to data from market research company Markets and Markets, the international unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) market is expected to grow from $17.82 billion in 2017 to $48.88 billion by 2023.

  Currently, the top two drone makers in the world are based in China. According to data from the U.S. think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), DJI held a 72 percent market share in 2017, followed by Yuneec with 5 percent. U.S. drone maker 3D Robotics was No. 3 with 4 percent, followed by French maker Parrot with 2 percent. Autel ranked fifth with 2 percent market share.

  • Category: Industry trends
  • Beijing Law Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd.
    Beijing Law Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd.

    Copyright: Beijing Law Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd.          Powered by www.300.cn         京ICP备09099344号-1

    Beijing Law Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd.

    Copyright: Beijing Law Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd.          Powered by www.300.cn​         京ICP备09099344号-1